Today, it will be a post with some small things about the two data types, Rat and Num.

First of all, Zoffix Znet added some insights on Twitter regarding my previous posts. Let me just quote them here.

Some useful information about `DIVIDE_NUMBERS` and `DON'T_DIVIDE_NUMBERS`:

*FWIW, these will be gone some time these year, together with .REDUCE-ME method. Rats are meant to be immutable, so once we get native uint64s straightened out, to counteract perf loss from removal of DON’T_DIVIDE optimization, all of these ops will just be making new Rationals.*

And about dividing by zero:

*You can divide by zero *and* announce it to others, as long as you use the Num view of Rationals, which uses IEEE 754-2008 semantics with regards to division by zero
<Zoffix> m: .Num.say for 1/0, -1/0, 0/0
<camelia> rakudo-moar a9a9e1c97: OUTPUT: Â«Infâ€-Infâ€NaNâ€Â»*

Let us play with dividing by 0 a bit more.

So, indeed, you can getÂ `Inf` if you cast a Rat value to Num:

$ perl6 -e'say (1/0).Num' Inf

By the way, donât forget that some spaces are meaningful in Perl 6. The following two lines of code are different:

say (1/0).Num; say(1/0).Num;

The first line printsÂ `Inf`, while the second throws an exception. This is because the first line is equivalent to:

say((1/0).Num);

While the second line tries to convert the result of callingÂ `say` to Num.

Let us trace the data types in the following program:

my $x = 1/0; say $x.WHAT;# say $x; # Error my $y = $x.Num; say $y.WHAT;# (Rat)say $y;# (Num)# Inf

Is it possible that Rats also returnÂ `Inf`Â after division by zero?

First of all, here is the method of the Rational role that is used to convert a Rat number to a Num value:

method Num() { nqp::p6box_n(nqp::div_In( nqp::decont($!numerator), nqp::decont($!denominator))) }

The rest of the work is thus done by some NQP code, which in the end gives usÂ `Inf`.

Let us start with a simple thing first and printÂ `Inf`Â when the value is stringified. Replace theÂ `Str` method of the Rational role with the following:

multi method Str(::?CLASS:D:) { unless $!denominator { return 'NaN' unless $!numerator; return 'Inf' if $!numerator >= 0; return '-Inf'; } }

This should only solve the problem in the cases when a âbrokenâ number is used as a string, for example:

my $x = 1/0; say $x;# Infmy $y = -1/0; say $y;# -Infmy $z = 0/0; say $z;# NaN

Surprisingly, it gave us even more, and we can use such numbers in calculations:

$ ./perl6 -e'my $x = 1/0; my $y = 1 + $x; say $y' Inf

Now, look at the originalÂ `Str`Â method:

multi method Str(::?CLASS:D:) {my $whole = self.abs.floor;my $fract = self.abs - $whole;# fight floating point noise issues RT#126016 if $fract.Num == 1e0 { ++$whole; $fract = 0 } my $result = nqp::if( nqp::islt_I($!numerator, 0), '-', '' ) ~ $whole; if $fract { my $precision = $!denominator < 100_000 ?? 6 !! $!denominator.Str.chars + 1; my $fract-result = ''; while $fract and $fract-result.chars < $precision { $fract *= 10; given $fract.floor { $fract-result ~= $_; $fract -= $_; } } ++$fract-result if 2*$fract >= 1; # round off fractional result $result ~= '.' ~ $fract-result; } $result }

If you debug the code, you will soon discover that the exception happens in the first lines, when theÂ `abs` method is called on a number.

This method is defined in the Real role:

method abs() { self < 0 ?? -self !! self }

Let us redefine it for Rationals (ignore negative values for now):

method abs() { if $!denominator == 0 { Inf } else { $!numerator / $!denominator } }

Now, the check happens in this method. Letâs try it:

$ ./perl6 -e'my $x = 1/2; say $x;' 0.5 $ ./perl6 -e'my $x = 1/0; say $x;'Inf.NaNNaN

Almost what is needed. You may fix the output as an exercise or just runÂ `git checkout src`Â đ

## One thought on “đŹ39. Experimenting with Rats and Nums in Perl 6”